NATO called the damage to the Nord Streams a sabotage

The press service of the North Atlantic Alliance has published a special statement on the situation with the gas pipelines of the Nord Stream system. It says that the position of the block is shared by the invited members of the alliance

Damage of Nord Stream 1 gas pipelines and Nord Stream 2 are a deliberate sabotage, according to NATO. This is stated in a press release published on the website of the North Atlantic Alliance.

“All currently available information indicates that this is the result of deliberate, reckless and irresponsible acts of sabotage. These leaks pose risks to shipping and cause significant damage to the environment. We support ongoing investigations aimed at establishing the origin of the damage,— the message says.

“Any deliberate attack on critical Allied infrastructure will be met with a unified and decisive response,”— NATO assured.

About the unprecedented destruction on two gas pipelines of the company «daughter» “Gazprom” Nord Stream AG said Tuesday morning, September 27th. “The destruction that occurred on the same day simultaneously on three strings of the offshore gas pipelines of the Nord Stream system is unprecedented,” the company said in a statement. The pressure dropped sharply in branch A of the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline and in both lines of Nord Stream 1.

Seismologists in Denmark and Sweden recorded powerful explosions in areas where there were leaks from the Nord Stream gas pipeline. The Swedish Coast Guard on the morning of September 29 reported that a fourth leak had been discovered on gas pipelines, with two of the four leaks occurring in the exclusive economic zone of this country.

Russia intends to convene a meeting of the UN Security Council in connection with the “provocations” in relation to the Nord Stream 1 gas pipelines; and Nord Stream 2.

German security authorities launched an investigation. According to Der Tagesspiegel sources, two main versions are being considered— that it could have been an operation by Ukrainian forces or a Russian operation carried out under a “false flag”.

Read on RBC Pro Pro 6 exercises to prevent problems due to sedentary work Instructions Pro Stressed shoulders and neck: 5 exercises to relieve stress Instructions Pro Cross-pollination: how the environment forms leaders, and leaders form the environment Instructions Pro Promotions and crypto is a game into an eagle. Are there any investment ideas left in Russia? employer needs to know Instructions

The Kremlin called the assumptions about Russia's involvement in the accidents “predictably stupid.” Both lines of Nord Stream 2 filled with gas, all systems are ready for pumping, and this gas is very expensive. <…> And now this gas is escaping into the air, — said the press secretary of the President Dmitry Peskov. At the same time, the Kremlin did not make any specific accusations, stating that a thorough investigation is needed.

Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said that the accidents on gas pipelines occurred in an area controlled by US intelligence agencies. According to her, Sweden and Denmark, in whose special economic zones the accidents occurred, are “stuffed with American weapons”; and the situation there is “totally controlled by American intelligence agencies.”

However, she did not directly blame the United States. “Here we are not talking about the readiness [to accuse], here we are talking about the beginning of a big job,” Zakharova noted.

Authors Tags

Источник rbc.ru

NATO planes make up to 35 weekly flights along the borders of Belarus

Aircraft of the North Atlantic Alliance fly about 30-35 times every week along the Belarusian border for reconnaissance purposes, said State Secretary of the Security Council of the Republic Alexander Volfovich.

According to him, four flights were recorded today reconnaissance aircraft, TASS reports.

Volfovich noted an increase in the number of exercises that NATO conducts in European countries. He said that the alliance grouping in Eastern Europe has about 35,000 military personnel, more than two thousand aircraft, there are 15 warships in the Mediterranean and Baltic Seas, including two nuclear submarines, an aircraft carrier, and more than 300 cruise missiles.

Former assistant to US President Ronald Reagan, Doug Bandow, said earlier that the United States needs to prevent Ukraine from joining NATO or an organization similar to the alliance in order to avoid Kyiv's defense dependency in the future.

Rate the material

Источник aif.ru

Hungarian Foreign Minister urged to avoid conflict between Russia and NATO

Hungarian Foreign Minister Szijjártó: it is necessary to avoid a direct conflict between Russia and NATO /v6_top_pics/resized/673xH/media/img/1/54/756640042253541.jpg 673w” media=”(max-width: 320px) and (-webkit-min-device-pixel-ratio: 2), (max-width : 320px) and (min-resolution: 192dpi)” >

Peter Szijjarto

In the current situation, it is important to prevent a conflict between Russia and the North Atlantic Alliance because of its consequences, said in an interview with RIA Novosti Hungarian Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto.

“Now this is the most important task— to avoid any direct conflict between Russia and NATO, since this will lead us to such consequences that neither side wants, — he said.

Szijjártó said that since the end of February, the expectation that there would be no major wars in the world has become illusory. In his opinion, a clash between Moscow and NATO would jeopardize the existence of the planet, and Hungary, in this regard, takes the position that alliance forces should not be sent to Ukraine. The Minister stressed that the resolution of the conflict depends largely on the dialogue between Russia and the United States.

The Russian side has repeatedly accused NATO of direct or indirect participation in the conflict in Ukraine. In early August, the first deputy head of the presidential administration, Sergei Kiriyenko, said that the Ukrainian authorities “gave away their country, their territory, and, worst of all, their people for use.” The West and NATO, which unleashed a “fundamental confrontation” against Russia.

The North Atlantic Alliance denies its direct participation in the conflict, but NATO countries supply Ukraine with weapons. In addition, they emphasized that the bloc is not looking for a confrontation with Moscow, but will respond to its actions in the event of an attack on one of the NATO members.

In July, the alliance adopted a new Strategic Concept, in which Russia is called the main threat block security. In accepting the document, NATO member countries also called on Moscow to stop the special operation in Ukraine.

Read on RBC Pro Pro Existential horror: why Apple intimidates buyers , which will only strengthen his Articles Pro 90 days before the shutdown of foreign cybersecurity systems. What to do Pro How To Valuing Real Estate During Turbulence: What Owners Need to Know Pro Articles 9 Ways to Quickly Recover from Stress Pro How To Do Why Email Has Made Employees Unhappy: 3 Reasons Pro Articles “Pay Growth For Years”: What It's Like To Work At Cisco – In 5 Points Articles Authors Tags Who is not subject to partial mobilization

Understanding the mailing list

Источник rbc.ru

Peaceful plans for genocide. The story of how the US and NATO did not threaten Russia

Plot World History with Andrey Sidorchik

Western leaders have launched a series of statements that boil down to one — there is no threat to Russia's security from representatives of the North Atlantic Alliance.

“NATO is not looking for a conflict with Russia”

“NATO is not looking for a conflict with Russia”, — announced Alliance Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg. “Putin says he had to act because Russia was threatened. But no one threatened Russia,», — declared at the UN General Assembly US President Joe Biden. In the same place, the new British Prime Minister Liz Truss said: “No one threatens Russia.”

In general, if you believe these words, our country is surrounded exclusively by pacifists, and the security threat &mdash ; this is purely Russian paranoia.

In 1996, director Tim Burton released the dark humor film Mars Attacks! In it, the inhabitants of the Red Planet, who arrived on Earth with predatory goals, are chasing earthlings with blasters and destroying them, while saying: “Don't run away! We are your friends! We came in peace!»

Perhaps this is the best illustration of the attitude of the West towards our country since the end of the Second World War.

The plan for the destruction of the Soviet Union from the Commander of the Order “Victory”

The last salvos of the war with the Nazis had not yet died down, and the Prime Minister of Great Britain Winston Churchill had already given the order to the Joint Planning Staff of the War Cabinet about preparing a plan code-named “The Unthinkable” — operations against the Red Army in Europe. Moreover, to implement it, it was planned to use, among other things, units of the Wehrmacht that had just surrendered to the Western allies.

The attack was to begin on July 1, 1945. However, the British generals announced to Churchill — the success of the attack cannot be guaranteed. Therefore, the “Unthinkable” sent to the archive. But that was only the beginning.

After the atomic attack on Hiroshima and Nagasaki by order of US President Harry Trumanin the fall of 1945, the development of the “Totality” plan began. It provided for an atomic attack on 20 Soviet cities, including Moscow and Leningrad, large industrial centers, as well as a number of capitals of the Union republics. The headquarters of Dwight Eisenhower — by the way, a holder of the Soviet military order “Victory”.

“Tasks Regarding Russia”: what America wanted to turn the USSR into

In 1948, the memorandum “Tasks Regarding Russia” was issued in the United States. According to him, after the victory of the United States, Russia:

  • should not be so militarily strong as to threaten its neighbors;
  • must grant broad autonomy to national minorities;
  • must be economically dependent on the outside world;
  • must not establish a new Iron Curtain.

Within the framework of the military plans of the United States, atomic strikes on the territory of the Soviet Union were supposed to be carried out from military bases located in the allied countries of the United States in Europe and Asia.

On March 17, 1948, five Western European states — Belgium, UK, Luxembourg, Netherlands and France — concluded the so-called Brussels Pact, the key provision of which was the creation of “collective self-defense”. Germany was considered as a possible aggressor in case the militarists returned to power, but first of all, the USSR was considered as an enemy.

«Dropshot»: destruction of millions of Soviet people and occupation

On April 4, 1949, 12 countries, among which were the signatories of the Brussels Pact, the United States, Canada, as well as Denmark, Italy, Norway, Portugal and Iceland, concluded the North Atlantic Treaty. The first Secretary General of NATO Ismay Hastings formulated the purpose of the organization's existence rather succinctly: “Keep the Soviet Union out, the Americans — inside, and the Germans — in a subordinate position.

In the same 1949, the US Joint Chiefs of Staff approved the Dropshot plan, according to which 300 atomic bombs were to be dropped on 100 largest cities and industrial centers of the USSR. In addition, it was supposed to strike with conventional bombs, which were supposed to be dropped on the heads of Soviet citizens by 250 thousand tons. Dropshot Plan assumed the prevention of retaliatory strikes from the USSR, the complete destruction of its military infrastructure, the occupation of the defeated country with the division of four “zones of responsibility”: the Western part of the USSR, the Caucasus — Ukraine, Ural — Western Siberia — Turkestan, Eastern Siberia — Transbaikalia — Primorye.

According to the Dropshot plan, only the first phase of the US atomic attack was supposed to take 20 million human lives. As for the 40 million victims, the Americans were not sure — they made them dependent on the level of resistance offered by the Soviet side. At the same time, the plan indicated that due to large-scale destruction, the life of the survivors would be “very complicated.”

“The unrealistic nature of the proposal does not deserve discussion”: how the USSR was not taken into NATO

The creation by the Soviet Union of its own atomic bomb in 1949 reduced the possibility of planning nuclear attacks against our country, but by no means made it completely abandoned.

At the same time, NATO representatives publicly stated that their bloc was aimed solely at ensuring peace. When Turkey was included in NATO in 1952, again declaring the peaceful nature of the organization, Joseph Stalinsarcastically remarked: “Shouldn't we join NATO then?”

On March 31, 1954, the government of the USSR sent an official note asking for admission to the North Atlantic Alliance. The document stated: “The North Atlantic Treaty Organization would cease to be a closed military grouping of states, it would be open to the accession of other European countries, which, along with the creation of an effective system of collective security in Europe, would be of paramount importance for strengthening world peace.”

The West's answer was exhaustive: “The unrealistic nature of the proposal is not worth discussing.” 

On May 9, 1955, West Germany was admitted to NATO. That is, in violation of all previous agreements of the countries — members of the anti-Hitler coalition made the country that initiated the Second World War a member of the military bloc.

179 nuclear strikes on Moscow

In 2015, the United States declassified plans for nuclear strikes on the USSR, drawn up by the US Strategic Air Command (SAC) in 1956. The plan included two detailed lists of more than a thousand targets, each in the territory of the USSR and its friendly countries, which were to be hit with nuclear weapons.

After the destruction of Soviet military airfields, as well as command posts, which, according to the authors of the plan, should have led to the impossibility of a retaliatory strike, it was planned to move on to the second part of — destruction of the industrial centers of the USSR in order to destroy the military industry of the Soviet Union. As conceived by American strategists, civilian objects also fell into the number of targets. Particular attention was paid to Moscow and Leningrad.

179 targets were included in the list of targets subject to an atomic strike in Moscow, in Leningrad — 145 targets. 

American researchers who studied the plan stated that it provided for the targeted destruction of the civilian population of the Soviet Union. It was about tens of millions of people.

The reverse side of the Caribbean crisis: what was Comrade Khrushchev wrong about?

The peak of the Cold War historians often refer to the Cuban Missile Crisis, which began with the secret operation Anadyr as — the transfer of Soviet medium-range missiles with nuclear warheads to Cuba. The American side called these actions of the Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev reckless.

But there is one caveat. In 1961, by order of US President John F. Kennedy, 15 American PGM-19 Jupiter medium-range missiles were deployed near the Turkish city of Izmir. with nuclear warheads.

The range of these missiles was 2,400 kilometers, which allowed them to hit the European part of the USSR, including Moscow.

The main advantage of medium-range missiles is the minimum time to reach the target. The flight time of American missiles from Turkey was less than 10 minutes. Thus, the ability of the Soviet side to take countermeasures in the event of a strike was reduced to a minimum.

Therefore, the actions of the USSR were in fact only an equivalent response. But in the United States, an incredible hysteria began at the thought that not only they could threaten destruction.

A new round

The Cuban Missile Crisis had a positive moment — there was some sobering up in the West, which later resulted in detente in the 1970s, when several important strategic arms limitation treaties were signed at once. But by the end of the decade, everything started all over again.

In 1979, the NATO Council decided to deploy more than 500 American medium-range missiles with nuclear warheads in Europe. In response, the Soviet side announced the deployment of its missiles on the territory of Czechoslovakia and the GDR.

By 1987, 108 Pershing-2 missile launchers were deployed in West Germany. and 64 Tomahawk missile launchers. In Great Britain there were 112 launchers of American Tomahawks, in Italy — 112, in the Netherlands — 16. 

Perestroika, and then the collapse of the socialist bloc and the USSR, it would seem, ended the Cold War. The Soviet Union, which was initially declared a threat to NATO, did not become, and, therefore, the existence of the North Atlantic Alliance lost its meaning.

Lost Illusions

However, the alliance has not gone away. The idea of ​​a neutral status for a united Germany remained an idea — the former socialist GDR actually became part of NATO.

In 1997, the founding act of Russia was signed — NATO, which declared that the parties do not consider each other as adversaries.

In 1999, two very important events took place. First — inclusion in the alliance of three former members of the Soviet bloc (Hungary, Poland, Czech Republic). The second — NATO armed aggression against Yugoslavia, which resulted in the separation of the province of Kosovo.

Thus, the promises of NATO's non-expansion to the East were buried, and the alliance itself carried out a large-scale offensive operation, which had no analogues in Europe since 1945.

Russia, based on statements about the peaceful nature of NATO, again proposed to consider the question of our country's inclusion in the alliance.

How Vladimir Putin wanted to join NATO

In 2000, Vladimir Putinin an interview with the BBC, he said he was considering Russia's membership in NATO: “Why not? I do not rule out such a possibility — in the event that the interests of Russia will be considered, if it is a full partner.

The same topic was also discussed at the talks with US President Bill Clinton. In 2017, Putin recalled this as follows: “During the discussion, I said:“ Maybe look at the option that Russia will join NATO. Clinton replied, “I don't mind.” But the entire delegation was very nervous.”

In 2004, the so-called “fifth enlargement of NATO” took place. The bloc included not only the former socialist countries, but also the former republics of the USSR: Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia.

Russian politicians have repeatedly posed the question to Western partners: if NATO's expansion to the East is not directed against Russia, then what kind of does it make sense? And why in new countries — NATO members find themselves at the helm of politics not only with an agenda that is not neutral, but openly hostile to Moscow?

Why did the US withdraw from the ABM Treaty?

On December 13, 2001, US President George Bush Jr. announced the US unilateral withdrawal from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty (ABM). This document, signed in 1972, was one of the cornerstones of nuclear security.

The American side argued that the refusal of the treaty was connected with the desire to ensure their own security on the part of Iran, North Korea and other so-called “rogue states”. Representatives of Russia reasonably noted that plans to deploy anti-missile position areas near the borders of the Russian Federation could not be considered otherwise than as an attempt to reduce the possibility of a nuclear potential for a retaliatory strike. This corresponds to the concept of “disarming strike” adopted in the US nuclear doctrine; — that is, Washington will strike first with its own forces so that the enemy will not have the opportunity to retaliate.

Thus, the situation can be returned to 1945, when the first plans for unpunished atomic aggression against our country were being developed, which provided for the destruction of tens of millions of people, followed by occupation.

“Against whom is this expansion against?”

In 2007, speaking at a security conference in Munich, Vladimir Putin stated: “The process of NATO expansion has nothing to do with modernizing the alliance itself or with ensuring security in Europe. On the contrary, it is a serious provoking factor that reduces the level of mutual trust. And we have a fair right to ask frankly: who is this expansion against? And what happened to the assurances given by the Western partners after the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact? Where are these statements now?.. Now they are trying to impose on us already new dividing lines and walls — albeit virtual, but still dividing, cutting our common continent. Will it really take many years and decades again, a change of several generations of politicians, to “sort” and “dismantle” these new walls?»

Western politicians considered that speech aggressive. In fact, it was an announcement that Russia intends to protect its interests and its citizens.

Alas, there was no sobering up in the West. Decades of the history of the North Atlantic Alliance clearly prove — NATO has no other ultimate goal, except for the destruction of Russia. And all the talk about a peaceful nature is a fairy tale.

Rate the material

Источник aif.ru

Clinton recalled conversations with Yeltsin about NATO expansion

The former US president then asked his Russian colleague whether he really admits the possibility that the United States will strike at Russia. Yeltsin answered in the negative

Bill Clinton and Boris Yeltsin, 1997

Former US leader Bill Clinton (1993-2001; 42nd President of the United States) spoke in an interview with CNN about a conversation with his Russian counterpart Boris Yeltsin about NATO's eastward advance. He said he asked the Russian president if he really considered the possibility of the United States striking Russia.

“I asked him, 'Do you really think I'm going to use a base in Poland to bomb Russia?' He replied: “No, but many in Russia think so because their historical memory includes Hitler and Napoleon.”

Clinton acknowledged this, but noted that historical ideas about Russia, in turn, is associated with such rulers as Ivan the Terrible, Peter I and Catherine II, when the Russian state “controlled its neighbors.” However, the ex-president is convinced, “people no longer want to be controlled,” they want to choose their own path.

The former American leader does not believe that NATO expansion, which began during his presidency, can be blamed for the outbreak of hostilities in Ukraine. He stressed that the US and NATO were not going to threaten Russia. Moreover, according to him, he offered Russia “not only a special partnership with NATO, but also the prospect of possible NATO membership.”

Russian President Vladimir Putin has repeatedly said that NATO countries have not kept promises not to expand “not one inch”; to the East. «I will repeat— deceived, and in popular language, they just threw it,— said, in particular, Putin in an address on February 24, the day the Russian military operation in Ukraine began. He recalled that in December 2021, Moscow once again tried to negotiate with the United States and its allies, but “all in vain.” The head of state called “further expansion of the infrastructure of the North Atlantic Alliance, the military development of the territories of Ukraine” unacceptable. “The problem is that in the territories adjacent to us, — I note that in our own historical territories, & mdash; a hostile “anti-Russia” is being created, which is placed under complete external control, is intensively settled by the armed forces of the NATO countries and is pumped up with the most modern weapons, — he said then.

The fact that Washington offered Yeltsin and Putin the possibility of Russia joining NATO, Clinton spoke back in the spring. He called untrue claims that the United States in any way tried to isolate Russia, showed disrespect or completely ignored it. At the same time, the former American leader agreed that the alliance really sought to expand eastward, despite Moscow's objections, calling NATO's actions at that time “correct and consistent decisions.”

Read on RBC Pro Pro “I found out about my resignation by phone”: the head of Adidas on turns in his career greens: how Europe is returning to fossil fuels Articles Pro How to open a Russian bank account in a foreign bank Instructions Pro Theory U: how to make the right decisions in business and life Articles Pro Why night snacks are dangerous not only for the figure Studies Pro “Eat, move, sleep”: how simple rules will help you live longer

Clinton said that he met with Yeltsin 18 times, and with Putin— five. “This is only three less than all the meetings between the leaders of the USA and the USSR from 1943 to 1991. The notion that we have ignored, disrespected, or tried to isolate Russia is false,” — he noted.

In 2017, Putin, in an interview with American director Oliver Stone, said that it was he who suggested that Clinton think about Russia joining NATO.

Authors Tags The Central Bank lowered the rate: what will happen to loans and deposits

Understanding the newsletter

Источник rbc.ru

NATO said it began discussing strengthening defense a few years ago

The alliance at the end of June decided to increase the number of rapid reaction forces by eight times and deploy heavy equipment near the borders of Russia. According to the head of the Military Committee, NATO is implementing what it planned a few years ago =”(max-width: 320px) and (-webkit-min-device-pixel-ratio: 2), (max-width: 320px) and (min-resolution: 192dpi)” >

Rob Bauer

NATO started planning for a stronger defense a few years ago, Admiral Rob Bauer, head of the alliance's military committee, told a press conference.

“We are talking about the biggest reorganization of our military structures since 1949. We started planning this a few years ago, but now we are implementing it,— he said.

At the NATO summit in Madrid at the end of June, the leaders of the alliance countries agreed in 2023 to increase the number of rapid reaction forces by almost eight times— up to 300 thousand people. Until 2014, it was planned that the scale of such forces would not exceed a division and amount to about 13,000 servicemen. NATO countries will train and finance these forces for the defense of certain territories in the east, and heavy equipment and weapons will be deployed on the border with Russia.

The new NATO Strategic Concept adopted at the summit calls Russia “the most serious and direct threat to the security of NATO members and peace and stability in the Euro-Atlantic region.”

NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said that the bloc had been preparing for a confrontation with Russia since 2014 and the military operation in Ukraine did not come as a surprise to him. “Therefore, we increased our military presence in the east of the alliance and NATO began to invest more money in defense,” — he explained.

According to Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov, the decisions of the NATO summit in Madrid fix the course for aggressive containment of Russia, but will not affect Russian policy, and Moscow “in any case” will ensure its safety.

Read on RBC Pro Pro Which design method helped the iPhone beat the Blackberry OFZ. Is it worth investing in public debt? creator of the Roblox gaming platform Articles Authors Tags Subscribe to Telegram

Источник rbc.ru

Foreign Affairs: The appearance of NATO soldiers in Ukraine could provoke a nuclear conflict

The appearance of NATO troops on the territory of Ukraine may lead to the start of a nuclear war.

Photo: pixabay.com

The American magazine Foreign Affairs reported that the appearance of NATO troops on the territory of Ukraine could lead to the outbreak of a nuclear war.

According to the authors of the article, at the moment, the United States, together with its allies, is trying to prevent any kind of escalation of the conflict that could provoke a direct conflict between the alliance and Russia.

“In the event that NATO troops appear in the air, on land or the Black Sea, this may push the Russian field commander to take actions that will lead to the death or injury of soldiers of the North Atlantic Alliance. This would be followed by an immediate NATO response, potentially starting a cycle of escalation. The worst scenario of which could be a nuclear war,” the newspaper notes.

The authors of the magazine urged to avoid this scenario at all costs and pointed out that Western countries are now increasingly supplying Ukraine with modern weapons and intelligence data.< /p>

Источник www.mk.ru

Yeni Şafak learned about Turkey’s appeal to NATO because of the threat of Greek S-300s

Yeni Şafak: Turkey will turn to NATO because of Greece's use of the S-300 against the F-16 S-300, although she assured that she uses them only in exercises (max-width: 320px) and (-webkit-min-device-pixel-ratio: 2), (max-width: 320px) and (min-resolution: 192dpi)” >

< img class="aligncenter" src="https://s0.rbk.ru/v6_top_pics/media/img/4/21/756617527531214.jpg" alt="Yeni Şafak found out about Turkey's accession to NATO because of the threat of Greek -300" />

Anti-aircraft missile system S-300

Ankara intends to appeal to NATO in connection with the fact that the Greek military aimed a missile system from the S-300 system at the F-16 aircraft of the Turkish Air Force, Yeni Şafak reports, citing a high-ranking source in the Turkish Ministry of Defense.

On August 28, CNN T & uuml; rk reported, citing sources in the Turkish Ministry of Defense, that the Greek side on the island of Crete used S-300 air defense systems to capture and escort Turkish F-16 reconnaissance aircraft.

< p>According to source Yeni Şafak, data on the incident will be discussed with Turkish colleagues in NATO and with the United States. “We are under pressure on the S-400, but Greece is actively using the S-300. When we pointed this out, we were told: “Not used, stored in hangars, used only in exercises.” But it turned out that this was not true,»,— indicated the interlocutor of the publication.

Relations between the countries have deteriorated sharply in the past few months due to a dispute over the status of the islands in the eastern Aegean, which passed to Greece following the Lausanne Treaty of 1923. The countries continued to argue about the delimitation of territorial waters and airspace, and Turkey made claims to Greece because of armaments on the islands. on which the Greek islands in the Aegean, as well as Crete, are depicted as Turkish. After that, Greek Foreign Minister Nikos Dendias said that the country fears the consequences of the rise of nationalism in Turkish society. He stressed that there were no conditions yet for improving relations with Turkey.

Greece and Turkey have been members of NATO since February 1952. However, after the conflict between the countries in Cyprus in the mid-1970s, Greece decided to withdraw from the military bloc. Then the island was divided between the predominantly Greek and Turkish population. The country again became a member of the alliance only in 1980.

Authors Tags Subscribe to Telegram

Источник rbc.ru

Medvedev considers Ukraine’s refusal to join NATO insufficient for the world

Russia still needs the security guarantees that President Vladimir Putin spoke about last year, Medvedev said. According to him, the prospect of negotiations will depend on the development of events -width: 320px) and (-webkit-min-device-pixel-ratio: 2), (max-width: 320px) and (min-resolution: 192dpi)” >

Ukraine's refusal to join NATO is not a sufficient condition for ending the military operation; this requires, among other things, an agreement on Russia's security guarantees, Deputy Chairman of the Russian Security Council Dmitry Medvedev said in an interview with the LCI TV channel.

p>

“Refusal to participate in the North Atlantic Alliance— it is now a necessary, but no longer sufficient, condition for achieving peace. It is necessary to work out the very guarantees about which <…>President Putin spoke»,— said Medvedev (quote from Interfax).

The deputy head of the Security Council said that Russia was ready for negotiations, while the Ukrainian authorities refused them, while advocating a summit meeting. “But they were told both by the president of our country and by other participants in these negotiations that such a meeting could take place only under certain conditions,” — Medvedev recalled.

At the end of December 2021, Russia proposed to Western countries a draft security guarantee, which provided for the rejection of NATO expansion to the east and the deployment of alliance bases and weapons in the countries of the former USSR. In January, negotiations were held in Brussels with the participation of Russia, the United States and NATO on this issue, but they did not lead to anything. Washington and the North Atlantic Alliance rejected most of Russia's proposals.

On February 24, 2022, Russian President Vladimir Putin announced the start of a special operation in Ukraine. Moscow called it the goal of protecting the population of Donbass and ensuring the security of Russia in the face of a threat from NATO.

A few days after that, Russia and Ukraine began negotiations for a peaceful settlement. At a meeting of delegations from the two countries in Istanbul at the end of March, Kyiv handed over to Moscow a number of proposals, including on a non-nuclear and non-bloc status of Ukraine. Russian President Vladimir Putin called the results of the negotiations in Turkey a “breakthrough”, but later said that Kyiv began to deviate from the agreements reached, which is why the dialogue stalled.

Read on RBC Pro Pro How Amazon and Walmart are struggling with falling consumer demand sphere can turn into a serious problem for Russia Forecasts Pro “This is a stab in the back for the industry”: what IT companies suffered the most to the failures Research Pro Replacing the dollar: what lies ahead for digital currencies and why e-CNY is still ahead Articles

Negotiations finally stopped in mid-May. Moscow held the Ukrainian authorities and Western countries responsible for this. President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky allowed a return to negotiations, subject to the return of the territories lost by Kyiv from February 24. He also ruled out negotiations with Moscow in case of holding referendums in the territories occupied by Russia.

Authors Tags Persons

Dmitry Medvedev

politician, ex-president, deputy head of the Security Council of Russia

September 14, 1965

Источник rbc.ru

NATO reported a good harvest of honey

NATO called the experiment on placing bee hives on the territory of the headquarters and obtaining honey as part of the green initiative a success.

The first two hives appeared in April 2020, so far their number has doubled. Each hive produces between 80 and 100 kg of honey per season, some of which is left to support the life of the bees.

“Today, most of the honey produced is sold at the NATO charity bazaar in favor of supporting some local and international projects” , — the message says.

It was previously reported that Chinese scientists have learned to control the flight of a bee using electrodes in the brain.

Rate the material

Источник aif.ru

Scholz assured Putin in the winter that Kyiv would not be accepted into NATO in the next 30 years

Scholz, before the special operation, told Putin that Ukraine would not join NATO in the next 30 years, Scholz said that during a conversation with Putin before the start of hostilities in Ukraine, he assured the Russian president that NATO did not pose a threat to Moscow, and Kyiv's entry into the alliance ” won't happen in the next 30 years”

DPR: Ukrainian Armed Forces fired ten shells of NATO caliber 155 mm at Donetsk

At 03:45, the Ukrainian military fired ten shells with a caliber of 155 mm in the Budennovsky and Leninsky districts of Donetsk, reported on Monday, 22 August, in the Telegram channel of the JCCC office in the DPR.

Russia continues its special operation in Ukraine. On the eve of the Russian Ministry of Defense accused Ukraine of poisoning the Russian military in the Zaporozhye region with botulinum toxin type “B”.

The air defense system in Crimea worked several times. And in Sevastopol, a downed drone fell on the roof of the headquarters of the Black Sea Fleet.

An explosion occurred near the zoo of Mariupol, which was supposed to be visited by the pro-Russian head of the city.

Read online here.

Источник www.mk.ru

The Foreign Ministry called NATO’s policy of ignoring Russia’s “red lines” risky

Ryabkov: NATO's policy of ignoring Russia's “red lines” is extremely risky “https://s0.rbk.ru/v6_top_pics/resized/673xH/media/img/0/15/756611486472150.png 673w” media=”(max-width: 320px) and (-webkit-min-device-pixel -ratio: 2), (max-width: 320px) and (min-resolution: 192dpi)” >

< img class="aligncenter" src="https://s0.rbk.ru/v6_top_pics/media/img/0/15/756611486472150.png" alt="The Foreign Ministry called NATO's policy of ignoring Russia's "red lines" risky" />

Sergey Ryabkov

The destructive course of the NATO countries to ignore the “red lines” Russia and drawing Moscow into the confrontation in Ukraine “with balancing on the brink of a direct armed conflict” is extremely risky, said in an interview with Izvestia; Deputy Foreign Minister of Russia Sergey Ryabkov.

According to him, this is fraught with further escalation up to a military clash of nuclear powers “with the ensuing dire consequences.” “This must be prevented,” — emphasized the diplomat.

Ryabkov pointed out that in modern “turbulent” conditions, nuclear risks are very significant, so they cannot be underestimated or artificially “inflated”. “We consider one of the most important tasks in this context to be the preservation of the nuclear “five” by all countries. (Russia, USA, China, Great Britain and France — RBC.) adherence to the postulate of the inadmissibility of any war between countries possessing nuclear weapons»,— he concluded.

A few months before the start of the special operation in Ukraine, Moscow sent proposals for security guarantees to the United States and NATO countries. They proposed that the alliance abandon expansion to the east, including at the expense of Ukraine, not deploy military bases in the post-Soviet space and introduce mutual arms restrictions.

In January 2022, Russia, the United States and NATO held a series of consultations on the issue of security guarantees, but this did not lead to results. The United States called it impossible for NATO to refuse to accept new members, as this is contrary to the “open door” policy.

Later, President Vladimir Putin, speaking about the decision to start a special operation in Ukraine, stated that “Russia cannot feel safe, exist with a constant threat emanating from the territory of modern Ukraine.” He explained that we are talking about expanding to the east and bringing NATO infrastructure closer to the Russian borders.

Read on RBC Pro Pro How brands go to the point of absurdity in texts about themselves Instructions Pro Russian maybe: how the risk management of the largest companies in Russia has changed from parents and earned $ 1 billion Articles Pro How hard the sanctions hit the goods market 18+ Articles Pro How governments around the world withdraw super profits from oilmen Articles Pro What do they buy in the summer on Wildberries and who sells the most. Rating Research Pro The main thing is not to reach Abibas: what should be the import-substituting brand therefore, in this sense, [NATO] expansion at the expense of these countries does not pose an immediate threat.” “But the expansion of military infrastructure in the territory of this region will certainly cause our response,” — the President added.

Authors Tags Subscribe to Telegram

Источник rbc.ru

Blinken handed over documents on the accession of Finland and Sweden to NATO

photo en.wikipedia.org

US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken announced in his microblog on Twitter that a package of documents on Washington's ratification of Finland and Sweden's accession to the alliance.

“I handed over … to the North Atlantic Treaty Depositary the US instruments of ratification as the last step in the process of ratifying Finland and Sweden's accession to NATO,” he wrote.

p>

Источник www.mk.ru

The Russian Foreign Ministry assessed the possibility of a direct clash with the United States and NATO

< img class="aligncenter" src="https://s0.rbk.ru/v6_top_pics/media/img/6/88/756608349051886.png" alt="The Russian Foreign Ministry assessed the possibility of a direct clash with the US and NATO" />< /p>

Russia is not interested in a direct clash with the United States and NATO countries, said Ivan Nechaev, Deputy Director of the Information and Press Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

“Our Armed Forces are equipped with modern and high-precision conventional (non-nuclear. — RBC) weapons, which allow us to fully implement the goals and tasks set by the President of Russia for the purposes of the NMD in Ukraine. Russia, as a nuclear power, will continue to act as responsibly as possible, a direct clash with the United States and NATO is not in our interests, — he said.

Nechaev stressed that “Russia has never saber-rattled, let alone nuclear.” At the same time, according to him, due to the supply of the “regime in Kyiv” clashes between Russia and the forces of the collective West are quite real.

Russia announced the start of a military special operation in Ukraine on the morning of February 24th. President Vladimir Putin called its goals the denazization and demilitarization of the neighboring country, as well as the protection of the population of Donbass from “genocide”; from Kyiv. Ukraine, in response, severed diplomatic relations with Moscow and declared martial law.

Against the backdrop of a special operation, the heads of state— members of the North Atlantic Alliance at the end of June adopted a new NATO strategic concept, in which Russia is called the most significant and direct threat to the security of the bloc. At the same time, the document notes that the alliance does not seek confrontation and does not pose a threat to Russia, and is also ready to keep channels of communication with Moscow open, despite the fact that it no longer considers it a partner.

This is not the first time the Russian leadership has accused NATO of an aggressive policy towards Moscow. In particular, the first deputy head of the presidential administration, Sergei Kiriyenko, said that the bloc was conducting a “hot military operation”; against Russia on the territory of Ukraine. Putin called the expansion of NATO to the East one of the reasons for holding the NWO in Ukraine.

Read on RBC Pro Pro Will investors be able to make money on people's desire to hide on the Web? or goods that are stuck in Europe Instructions Pro Russian maybe: how the risk management of the largest companies in Russia has changed Articles Pro “I left the boss humiliated”: how to deal with toxicity at work inaction: what happens to us in a dream quality of your life

Источник rbc.ru

NATO’s eastern flank countries urge the US to speed up the supply of weapons to them

Washington Post: Baltic and Eastern European countries are asking the United States to expedite the supply of weapons to them So, Estonia wants to receive MLRS HIMARS and Reaper attack drones, and Poland is waiting for ordered anti-aircraft missile systems Patriot, HIMARS, F-16 fighters and Abrams tanks

Eastern flank countries NATO is demanding more troops and more weapons to contain Russia, writes The Washington Post.

About 100,000 US troops are stationed across Europe, but the “more vulnerable” US allies consider this insufficient, the newspaper notes.

The Baltic and Eastern European countries are asking the United States to increase defense production to speed up the implementation of orders for weapons.

«HIMARS [US multiple launch rocket systems], Reaper [attack drones], counter-battery radars— this is what we will need most in terms of the lethal combat power that will inevitably be required to contain Russia, — Estonian Defense Ministry Chancellor Kusti Salm said in an interview with the newspaper.

At the same time, Polish officials believe that the defense of the republic would be helped if the United States accelerated the supply of weapons that had already been promised to Warsaw. Poland is expecting US Patriot, HIMARS, F-16 fighter jets and Abrams tanks.

Meanwhile, Latvian Defense Minister Artis Pabriks told reporters that his country wants modern long-range rocket artillery as well as air defense systems. and coastal defense, which are usually not available to countries with a modest budget.

Read on RBC Pro Pro “Let's start tomorrow”: how to help a procrastinator speed up Instructions Pro How to get money from the sale of real estate in Russia while abroad Instructions Pro “The subtle art of giving a damn”: how to stop following imposed goals Summary Pro “Mom, why are we like this poor?”: how to answer uncomfortable questions from children Pro instructions “We just got canceled”: how Russian companies are being canceled in the West Pro articles Who are inverse paranoids and why they succeed Articles Pro The most important tax amendments that will appear in the fall of 2022 Articles

At the end of June, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg announced that the bloc was going to increase the rapid reaction force from 40,000 to 300,000 by 2023. At the same time, noted the coordinator for strategic communications of the National Security Council (NSC) John Kirby, Russia has no reason to consider the buildup of NATO troops on the eastern flank as a provocation. The NATO countries in the new Strategic Concept recognized Russia as “the most serious and direct threat to the security of NATO members and peace and stability in the Euro-Atlantic region.” The bloc will continue to counter the “Russian threats”, its “irresponsible rhetoric” and respond to “her hostile actions.”

In the spring, the US announced plans to deploy two Patriot batteries to Poland “in a proactive manner to counter any potential threats to the US, allied forces, and NATO territory.” The batteries will be transferred under Article 5 on NATO collective defense (which means that an attack on one of the NATO members will be considered an attack on all NATO members).

At the end of July, Pentagon departmental publication Stars and Stripes wrote that the United States was going to send fifth-generation Boeing F-22 Raptor fighters to Poland in support of NATO's mission to air cover the alliance's eastern flank. They will be stationed at the 32nd Tactical Air Base near the Polish city of Lask.

This week, the US mission to NATO announced that members of the US Army's elite 101st Airborne Division, known as the “Screaming Eagles”, will be transferred to Europe to strengthen the eastern flank.

The Kremlin noted that the “romantic period” in relations with NATO was replaced by everyday work. “Working days, so to speak, routine relations, lie in the fact that NATO, as it was created and conceived as an instrument of confrontation, it still performs these functions. NATO cannot perform any other functions simply by its very nature. That's how we treated NATO, that's how we treat NATO,” — said the press secretary of the President of Russia Dmitry Peskov.

Video

Authors Tags

Источник rbc.ru

Turkey accuses Sweden and Finland of not fulfilling NATO promises

Turkish Foreign Minister Cavusoglu: Sweden and Finland did not fulfill their promises to join NATO Turkey has not seen Sweden and Finland take steps to extradite the Kurds, the Foreign Minister said. Swedish SVT writes that Stockholm is ready to extradite one of them. Turkey promises in return to approve the entry of these countries into NATO media=”(max-width: 320px) and (-webkit-min-device-pixel-ratio: 2), (max-width: 320px) and (min-resolution: 192dpi)” >

Mevlut Cavusoglu

Sweden and Finland have not yet fulfilled the demands made by Ankara to join NATO, Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu said at a press conference, quoted by the Turkish Anadolu agency.

The Minister recalled the agreement that Ankara has concluded with Helsinki and Stockholm. According to him, they must extradite members of the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK), which it considers terrorist, to Turkey, close all organizations associated with its structures, and give guarantees to Ankara. Turkey, for its part, undertook not to impede the entry of these countries into NATO. However, the Turkish side has not yet seen Sweden and Finland take any steps in this direction, he said.

For a state to join NATO, it must be approved by all other current members of the organization. However, Turkey has stated that it will prevent this until Helsinki and Stockholm comply with its demands.

The diplomat said that NATO can justify the use of nuclear weapons

Diplomat Belousov: NATO can be expected to justify any use of nuclear weapons The United States “reserved the opportunity” to use nuclear weapons “at any moment, for any reason and against any state” under the pretext of threatening their interests or their allies, Andrei Belousov believes

NATO countries in the future can be expected to justify any use of nuclear weapons, says Andrei Belousov, deputy head of the Russian delegation to the 10th Review Conference of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). His words are quoted on the website of the Permanent Mission

of Russia to the UN.

“By the way, there is every reason for such a conclusion. The doctrinal documents of the United States prescribe the use of nuclear weapons under the pretext of threatening their own vital interests or those of their allies, — Belousov pointed out.

Thus, the United States “reserved the opportunity” use nuclear weapons “at any moment, for any reason and against any state”; under this pretext, the diplomat noted.

“And this is the real threat of a nuclear war. Especially considering that the United States remains the only state that has put its nuclear arsenal into practice,— he added.

US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken said that his country could use nuclear weapons “only under extraordinary circumstances, to protect the vital interests of the United States, allies and partners.”

In early March, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov called the deployment of American nuclear weapons on the territory of European countries unacceptable. According to him, this is contrary to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. Lavrov also noted that “the vicious practice of joint nuclear missions with the participation of non-nuclear NATO countries persists.” Thus, the possibility of a nuclear strike on Russia is being worked out, the minister argued. “It's high time to bring American nuclear weapons home, and the associated infrastructure in Europe to be completely eliminated,” — he said.

Read on RBC Pro Pro Why there are no such bright logos in Europe as Coca-Cola Articles Pro What does the Swiss tax system offer to Russian businessmen: an overview Articles Pro Common Decision Making Mistakes Articles Pro “You're just a cog”: what it's like to work at Microsoft – in 5 points Pro articles Due to what phrases and attitudes of parents children will not be able to become leaders Pro Employees at a distance began to work worse: how to ethically control them Instructions Authors Tags Subscribe to RuTube RBC Live broadcasts, videos and recordings of programs on our RuTube channel

Источник rbc.ru

In Moscow, they announced a strike on the arsenal of NATO ammunition in Ukraine

Ministry of Defense: an arsenal with 45 thousand tons of NATO ammunition was destroyed in the Nikolaev region “image/webp” media=”(max-width: 320px) and (min-resolution: 192dpi)” >< source srcset="https://s0.rbk.ru/v6_top_pics/resized/590xH/media/img/7/83/756598728849837.webp 590w" type="image/webp" >

Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation < p>Near the city of Voznesensk, Mykolaiv region of Ukraine, a warehouse was destroyed, which stored 45,000 tons of ammunition supplied by NATO countries for the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the Russian Ministry of Defense reported.

Video

In addition, Russian aviation, rocket troops and artillery attacked three command posts of Ukrainian forces in the DPR, as well as troops and equipment of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in 173 districts. The launcher of the Buk-M1 air defense system, five ammunition depots were destroyed.

At the request of Roskomnadzor, RBC provides data on the details of the military operation in Ukraine based on information from Russian official sources.

p>

Earlier, the Ministry of Defense reported on the seizure of weapons in the Izyum direction, including foreign ones. The department published a video with captured weapons. Among them— weapons manufactured in the UK, USA, Poland, Sweden, including Javelin man-portable anti-tank missile systems and Carl Gustaf machine guns, as well as heavy machine guns and Soviet-made small arms abandoned by the Ukrainian military.

Tags RBC Comfort

Mailing from news that

affects the quality of your life

Источник rbc.ru

American veterans urged to block the entry of Sweden and Finland into NATO

photo en.wikipedia.org

The press service of the United States veterans association Concerned Veterans for America published an appeal to the US Senate in which veterans urged parliamentarians to disapprove of NATO expansion to include Sweden and Finland.

CVA Senior Adviser Dan Caldwell recalled that the US is currently saddled with $30 trillion in public debt, record inflation and growing limits on military capabilities .

“The last thing we need to do now is — it is to extend security guarantees through NATO to two more rich European states … The main attention must be paid to domestic needs and security,” he stressed.

Источник www.mk.ru

The US Senate approved the accession of Sweden and Finland to NATO

Thus, the US added to the list of more than 20 countries whose legislature ratified documents on NATO expansion. For Finland and Sweden to join the bloc, the consent of all 30 members of the alliance is required image/webp” media=”(max-width: 320px) and (min-resolution: 192dpi)” >< source srcset="https://s0.rbk.ru/v6_top_pics/resized/590xH/media/img/1/96/756595642601961.webp 590w" type="image/webp" >

The US Senate approved a resolution to ratify the protocols on accession of Finland and Sweden to NATO, Reuters reports.< /p>

According to the agency, “for” the accession of countries to the military alliance voted 83 senators, “against”— one.

Thus, the resolution was adopted by a majority of the 67 required votes, and the United States added to the list of more than 20 countries whose legislatures ratified documents on NATO expansion. To join the NATO bloc, Sweden and Finland need to all 30 member countries of the alliance have ratified the corresponding agreement.

Finland and Sweden applied to join NATO in May this year. The countries emphasized that the decision is related to the Russian military operations in Ukraine, however, it is not directed against Moscow and is due to the “changed security situation”.

According to the application procedure, everyone must approve NATO members, but Turkey opposed. She demanded that the countries extradite members of the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK), which Turkey considers a terrorist organization, to Ankara, close all organizations associated with the PKK structures, and provide Turkey with guarantees.

Nevertheless, already at the end of June, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan met with Finnish President Sauli Niinistö and Swedish Prime Minister Magdalena Andersson. The parties were able to agree on the issue of countries joining NATO, and Ankara agreed to support the candidates. Erdogan subsequently stated that parliament would only ratify their applications after they fulfilled their promises to Ankara.

In early July, Erdogan again stressed that Turkey would return to its original position regarding the membership of Sweden and Finland in the alliance if it sees “attempts to delay the implementation of the commitments made or hypocrisy.”

At the same time, Swedish Foreign Minister Ann Linde called exaggerated fears that Ankara could again block countries from joining the alliance. “I think we've worked so hard on this that we don't have to worry too much about further problems coming up. But it would be unreasonable of me to say that nothing will come up at all,— she said.

Read on RBC Pro Pro Anti-sanctions “plastic”: where is it better to get an international card can’t hold back the rise in prices »: how to stop following imposed goals Summary Pro I have low blood pressure. Is this normal or should I call an ambulance? Instructions Authors Tags How does this concern you?

Explained in the evening newsletter

$99 per month

Источник rbc.ru

“The US and NATO countries killed our children, women, old people”

A Balkan volunteer told why he is fighting for the DPR

The more time you spend in Donbas, the more you realize how many interesting people who are not indifferent to its fate are attracted to this region. A few days ago, I had the opportunity to meet a native of the Congo, who is participating in a special military operation in the ranks of the Chechen unit “Akhmat”. And here is a new acquaintance. Platoon commander of the infantry battalion of the operational group “Delta” of the People's Militia of the LPR with the call sign “Serb”.

As you might guess, the call sign of the serviceman was not chosen by chance. The man is indeed from Serbia. At the end of 2014, he came as a volunteer to the Donbass and after eight years, as the military himself admits, this land and its people became dear to him.

When asked why a citizen of another country suddenly had a desire to stand on defense of Donbass, “Serb” answers what motivated him first of all by the desire to help the Slav brothers:

– Here in 2014 there was not just a civil war, it was a clash of two large countries. And one of them, I'm talking about Ukraine now, just started killing defenseless people…

According to the “Serb”, he already saw everything that was happening in the Donbass in his country in 1999, when people sat under carpet bombing for 90 days.

– The United States and NATO countries killed our children, women, old people. It shouldn’t be like this.

It was this parallel with the suffering experienced from one’s own experience that became the key moment for making a decision, perhaps strange in the eyes of others, the interlocutor shares.

The Serb admits that he had no military training, let alone combat experience, until 2014.

– I didn't even know how to assemble or disassemble a machine gun. I learned everything here when I came. The mentors were good, real experts. Thanks to them.

– My military path began with Debaltseve, then served and settled in the Luhansk People's Republic. During the special operation, he took part in the assault on the city of Svetlodarsk, where our troops broke through the enemy's defenses. Unfortunately, then we lost the battalion commander and the company commander. They came under fire from the Ukrainian armed forces. It was a huge loss, but we still reached Svetlodarsk.

According to the interlocutor, it was the most difficult battle since the start of the special operation.

He says that if we compare the enemy, who was eight years ago, and the one that is now, the difference is visible to the naked eye.

– They began to work very smoothly. This has never happened before.

– Recently, our unit has liberated the Uglegorsk TPP, we are moving forward according to plan.

The assault on the thermal power plant, according to “Serb”, was indeed a very difficult task. The fortifications, pillboxes and dugouts, equipped by the Ukrainian military, were filled with concrete and practically looked like an impregnable fortress.

– But we have excellent artillery, – the military man says not without pride. – The guys worked very professionally. About two thousand shells were fired at the approaches to the station.

According to the “Serb”, if it were not for the support of artillery, the assault on the TPP could hardly have been successful. And most likely, it would have dragged on for a long time.

– The enemy artillery worked without interruption. We would not have been able to simply enter the open field with all our desire.

According to the serviceman, the TPP was a very significant strategic point. After all, it can “power up” the entire Donbass with electricity.

– No. My home is here. During this time, I have already become a citizen of the Russian Federation, and I am going to stay in the Donbass.

Donetsk, DPR.

Источник www.mk.ru

Assessed the likelihood of an armed conflict in Kosovo: what is the role of NATO

“For the forces of the Alliance, the repetition of past events is a scripted operation”

The night from July 31 to August 1 was marked for the Balkan Peninsula by a new round of tension between Serbia and self-proclaimed Kosovo. One of the main reasons is the refusal of the Pristina authorities to accept Serbian documents and the issuance of a temporary permit to enter the Kosovo territory.

Photo: Frame

The approach of the day when Serbian license plates will no longer be recognized on the territory of Kosovo caused a wave of protests among the population. The Serbs living in the region again began to feel discrimination from the authorities of Pristina. The Kosovo police announced the closure of the checkpoint and the bridge between Serbia and the partially recognized republic.

This escalation is no surprise to anyone. According to experts, nothing much is happening now, and any new round of tension in the region is perceived as an ordinary situation that occurs once a year for the past five years.

According to Alexander Pivovarenko, senior researcher at the Institute of Slavic Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, interest in new escalations arises from the growing military component of conflicts.

– There are more and more cases of mobilization of troops, that is, the pulling of the army to the borders. Therefore, each new escalation increases the risk of an armed conflict. The parties have little interest in this, but the risks objectively increase.

The situation is really ordinary. The events of September 2021, when the Kosovo authorities required Serbs living there to issue temporary Kosovo license plates, are similar to the current ones. The actions of Pristina then led to violent clashes between the police and Serbs entering the territory with Belgrade license plates. The situation escalated until weaning not only private cars, but also special ones. The help of Russia, which sent Pantsir complexes to Belgrade, extinguished the situation and brought life in the region to relative normality.

The viscosity of the conflict, however, has not disappeared. The events of last night showed that neither Pristina nor Belgrade will stop at peace agreements if the situation starts to get out of control. Yes, and the flair of the events of 23 years ago, which was frighteningly similar to the situation last night, is present.

As noted by Serbian publications, bells rang continuously in all churches and monasteries of Northern Kosovo, just like in 1999 before the bombing Yugoslavia.

NATO's interest in Pristina is also confirmed by experts. However, a repetition of the events of the late nineties is hardly to be expected. The escalation of the conflict, according to Alexander Pivovarenko, will lead to a scenario of punishing Serbia.

– For NATO forces, the repetition of past events – operation with a pre-written script. It should be noted that back in January 2021, in the foreign expert press, Serbia was called the culprit of a possible conflict in the Balkans, in Bosnia or Kosovo, the expert comments. – No matter where, but the culprit has already been identified. Now Serbia is also accused of its diplomatic position of cooperation with Russia, which, as it were, violates European discipline. Therefore, such an action would increase the viability of NATO and show that the bloc is capable of dealing with challenges. But this would lead to some kind of coercion of Belgrade.

The Serbian authorities understand this prospect, so there is no interest in escalation. The current tension does not come from Serbia, but Belgrade is forced to respond to the actions of Pristina. The world community should not be afraid of a large-scale armed clash, taking into account Pristina's delay in adopting the rule for replacing Serbian license plates with Kosovo ones, for the time being. According to expert assessment, such a scenario is possible if events at the border itself or somewhere else go according to a bad scenario. The appearance of victims, even by chance, will lead to irreversible events, and in the end Serbia will be declared the culprit, no matter what happens.

Based on such a scenario, the position of Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić is understandable, who, in an address to nation said that “Serbia will pray for peace, but if the persecution continues, Serbia will win.”

Recall that the autonomous province of Kosovo and Metohija declared independence from Serbia in February 2008. To date, 98 states have recognized Kosovo's independence. The remaining states did not recognize or remained neutral regarding the independence of the republic. The Serbian government considers Kosovo its territory. In 2013, the process of normalizing relations with the government of Kosovo began, but all steps remain ineffective.

Alarm sirens sound in Kosovo, citizens prepare barricades: eyewitness videos

Watch related videos

Источник www.mk.ru

Wasserman called for the recognition of the US and NATO as sponsors of terrorism

Americans support almost every terrorist group in the world

The US Senate earlier passed a resolution calling on the State Department to include Russia on the list of state sponsors of terrorism. The American authorities explain this by Russia's military actions in the territories of Chechnya and Georgia. Syria and Ukraine. State Duma Deputy Anatoly Wasserman is convinced that the US and NATO themselves should be recognized as sponsors of terrorism.

Photo: Lilia Sharlovskaya

V In an interview with NEWS.ru, Wasserman, in response to a US Senate resolution, acquitted Russia, noting that the Russian military was directly involved in suppressing terrorist threats in Chechnya, Georgia, Syria and Ukraine, unlike the Americans.

According to According to the parliamentarian, Russia suppressed terrorism with all its might in all the places listed by the Americans, and all normal people around the world “understand this very well.” Moreover, Wasserman stressed that almost all terrorist groups in the world are supported by the Americans, which is also well known to everyone.

The deputy believes that, based on this, it is necessary to recognize the United States and the entire NATO organization as sponsors of terrorism. The politician added that the inclusion of Russia in the list of states sponsoring terrorism could threaten Moscow with the introduction of new sanctions by the White House.

Read also:Political scientist Ishchenko assessed Kyiv's plans to return liberated territories

Источник www.mk.ru

Medvedev promised a symmetrical response to Finland’s accession to NATO

According to the deputy head of the Security Council, the accession of Sweden and Finland to the alliance will worsen the security situation in the Baltic region, and the border of Karelia with Finland will actually turn into the border of Russia with NATOv6_top_pics/resized/320xH/media/img/3/76/756590232317763.jpg 320w 800xH/media/img/3/76/756590232317763.jpg 800w v6_top_pics/resized/400xH/media/img/3/76/756590232317763.jpg 400w” media=”(max-width: 400px)” >

Dmitry Medvedev

Russia will respond symmetrically to the entry of Finland and Sweden into NATO, said Deputy Chairman of the Russian Security Council Dmitry Medvedev, without specifying what it was about.

“As for our reaction to the entry of these countries into NATO, then, as the President of our country said, this reaction will be symmetrical,— he told reporters following a meeting held in Karelia on ensuring Russia's security in the northwestern direction (quote from Interfax).

Video

At the same time, the deputy head of the Security Council pointed out that the accession of Sweden and Finland to NATO could worsen the security situation in the Baltic region, “because the Baltic Sea is now, in fact, becoming a sea dominated by NATO countries.” Medvedev also noted that now Karelia's border with Finland is becoming Russia's border with NATO.

In May, against the backdrop of Russia's military operation in Ukraine, Finland and Sweden applied to join NATO. The countries emphasized that the decision was not directed against Moscow and was due to the changed security situation.

According to the application procedure, all NATO members must approve, but Turkey opposed it. She demanded that the countries hand over to Ankara members of the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK), which Turkey considers a terrorist organization, close all organizations associated with the PKK structures, and provide Turkey with guarantees.

Read on RBC Pro Pro Why only 8% of Russians strive for unlimited wealth Studies Pro Parallel import of technology: what is wrong Articles Pro Why investors buy Armenian dram and ignore the Rand of South Africa Articles Pro “I'm like a ninja in a street fight”: Ray Dalio – about the impact Meditation Articles Pro How to avoid mistakes when creating a strategy: cases of Disney, Nike, JC Penny Articles Pro In the US markets, the era of Great Anger is coming. What It Means Articles Pro Oxygen Benefit. A simple, evidence-based breathing technique for health and sports Summary Pro Which marketplace to enter: comparing the commissions of the main sites Research

On June 28, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan met with Finnish President Sauli Niinistö and Swedish Prime Minister Magdalena Andersson. The parties were able to agree on the issue of countries joining NATO, and Ankara agreed to support the candidates. Erdogan subsequently stated that parliament would ratify their applications only after they fulfilled their promises to Ankara.

In early July, Erdogan reiterated that Turkey would return to its original position on Sweden's membership and Finland in the alliance if he sees “attempts to delay the implementation of the obligations taken or hypocrisy.”

At the same time, Swedish Foreign Minister Ann Linde called exaggerated fears that Ankara could again block countries from joining the alliance. “I think we've worked so hard on this that we don't have to worry too much about further problems coming up. But it would be unreasonable of me to say that nothing will come up at all,— she said.

Authors Tags Subscribe to Telegram

Источник rbc.ru

The expert predicted what NATO could become under the leadership of Boris Johnson

“The tone will get tougher”

In late July, The Daily Telegraph reported that British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, who is retiring, could take over as NATO Secretary General because he is supported by high-ranking members of the Tory party and Ukrainian politicians. Political scientist, president of the Minchenko Consulting Foundation Yevgeny Minchenko believes that under the leadership of Johnson, the Alliance can become more radical against the backdrop of the “militant and militant” nature of the politician.

Photo: Global Look Press

In an interview with NEWS.ru, Minchenko recalled that Johnson recently held a photo shoot where he holds a grenade launcher on his shoulder, throws a grenade and runs around with a machine gun. The expert sees no reason why Johnson could not lead NATO, especially since the Alliance is currently experiencing a renaissance. The political scientist explained that the bloc was considered a relic of the past for a long time, and now there is a “gift” in the form of events in Ukraine and the deterioration of relations with Russia.

In addition, Minchenko noted that the UK is now trying to build an alternative security bloc based on the London-Warsaw-Kyiv axis, so under the leadership of Johnson “the tone will become tougher” than under anyone else. According to the political scientist, NATO will be “pumped up” as an opponent of Russia, which he considers an enemy of the Alliance.

Nevertheless, the expert stressed that the United States remains the dominant force in NATO, but now one can observe the radical militarization of Europe, as well as the rearmament of Germany and other countries. According to Minchenko, the old weapons are “merge” to Ukraine, and the countries' own weapons fleet is being updated.

The political scientist added that Johnson is one of the most professional and experienced politicians. The British prime minister is cynical, and he understands the importance of the public factor, and his eccentricity is only the mainstream and modern political style, and not the “eccentricities” of one character, Minchenko concluded.

Read also:Political scientist appreciated the imposition of US sanctions on China's purchase of Russian oil

Источник www.mk.ru

Poland has promised to create the strongest NATO ground forces in Europe

Defense Minister Mariusz Blaszczak assured that the republic will have the strongest ground forces among European NATO countries

Mariusz Blaszczak

Poland will have the strongest ground forces among European NATO countries, said the Minister of Defense of the Republic, Mariusz Blaszczak, in an interview with Sieci, excerpts from which were published by the portal wPolityce.

“Polish Armed Forces must be so numerous and strong that their existence deterred the aggressor. <…> Both in terms of artillery and armored forces, in the final analysis, there will be no stronger country in Europe. We will have the strongest ground forces among European NATO countries,— Blaszczak assured, answering the question whether the country would be able to repel the attack.

He recalled that Poland purchased American Patriot anti-aircraft missile systems back in 2018. At the end of May of this year, Blaszczak announced that he had ordered six more Patriot batteries. The day before, the minister wrote on Twitter that deliveries of Patriot elements, including PAC-3 MSE missiles and IBCS fire control systems, continue.

Warsaw also acquired the British Sky Saber air defense system, the head of the Ministry of Defense announced its receipt in early July.

“Finally, we have our own Piorun [Polish portable anti-aircraft missile systems], which have proven themselves in Ukraine,” — he noted.

In early March, U.S. European Command announced that the United States would move two Patriot batteries to Poland “in a proactive manner to counter any potential threats to the U.S., allied forces, and NATO territory.” They assured that the batteries would be transferred under Article 5 on NATO collective defense (it means that an attack on one of the NATO members will be considered as an attack on all NATO members). Later, the Pentagon explained that the Patriot would be placed in Poland temporarily.

Read on RBC Pro Pro Buddha's Brain. Neuropsychology of happiness, love and wisdom Sammari Pro 5 trillion rubles. Lost Income: What's in the Service Industry Research Pro Sleeping 8 Hours a Day and Being Lazy: Jeff Bezos' Healthy Habits What is depersonalization and how to deal with it Articles Pro Anger, disgust and debriefing: why talking about sex is so difficult Instructions Pro Home cardio training: five basic exercises Instructions Pro Where do “nervous” habits come from and how to get rid of them Instructions

In early April, the republic purchased 250 Abrams tanks from the United States. The first combat armored vehicles have already arrived for military training, the Polish defense minister said in mid-July. The value of the contract is $4.75 billion. Deliveries are scheduled to be completed in 2026.

Poland is ranked 24th in the ranking of the strongest armies in the world according to Globalfirepower. The index takes into account more than 50 factors, including not only the number of military and equipment, but also logistical capabilities and geography. The number of military in Poland is estimated at 152 thousand people, the country has 863 tanks, 4786 armored vehicles, 609 self-propelled artillery installations and 197 multiple rocket launchers.

Authors Tags

Источник rbc.ru

Khamenei accused NATO of preparing a conflict with Russia under the pretext of Crimea

Khamenei believes that the alliance would have unleashed a war with Russia if it had not launched a military operation in Ukraine. The Iranian Foreign Ministry previously stated that the hostilities on Ukrainian territory were caused by “NATO provocations”

Ali Khamenei (left) and Vladimir Putin

NATO started a war with Russia under the pretext of Crimea, but the Russian alliance military operation in Ukraine, believes Iran's spiritual leader Ali Khamenei.

In his opinion, the West does not want to see Russia strong, and the North Atlantic Alliance— this is a dangerous organization. “If you didn’t oppose NATO in Ukraine, then the alliance itself would start a war under the pretext of Crimea,” — he said (quoted by Irna) at a meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Khamenei believes that “today America and the West are weaker than before” and “despite efforts and huge amounts of money” their policies in Syria, Iraq, Lebanon and Palestine are less successful than they used to be. He said that Moscow and Tehran need to develop economic cooperation that meets the interests of both countries, “especially in the face of Western sanctions,” Mehr reports.

Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amir Abdollahian said in February that the fighting in Ukraine was caused by “NATO provocations” and called for a peaceful resolution of the conflict. Later, Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi expressed his readiness to assist in the settlement.

The Russian authorities have repeatedly expressed the opinion that Ukraine's entry into NATO will create a threat of a military conflict between Russia and the alliance over Crimea. In February, even before the start of hostilities in Ukraine, Putin said that if Kyiv joined the alliance, it would decide to return the peninsula by military means, “which means there will be a military confrontation between Russia and NATO.”

Deputy Chairman of the Security Council Dmitry Medvedev , for its part, believes that due to “unresolved territorial disputes” between Moscow and Kyiv, including the ownership of Crimea, Ukraine's accession to NATO could lead to the Third World War and “total catastrophe”.

Read on RBC Pro Pro How to find a common language with your child: Yulia Gippenreiter tells Summary Pro How a kid from the slums became the richest Korean, pushing the head of Samsung Articles Pro There are more and more sellers on Ozon and Wildberries. How it will change marketplaces How to make money on it Articles Pro Five luxury brands go public. What is important to know about the Lanvin Group Articles Pro “Worse than in an orphanage”: what it's like to work on Wall Street – in 4 points However, in early March, President Volodymyr Zelensky said that Kyiv had “cooled” to this question. On June 25, the office of the head of state reported that Kyiv would not take steps to join the bloc, since the members of the alliance rejected the aspirations of the country.

Tags

Источник rbc.ru

Kadyrov announced plans to “demilitarize” NATO

According to the head of Chechnya, after the capture of Kyiv, Poland is next in line =”Kadyrov announced plans to “demilitarize” NATO” />

Ramzan Kadyrov

Head of Chechnya Ramzan Kadyrov announced “grand plans” on “demilitarization” NATO countries.

“We are already developing a plan for the demilitarization of NATO countries, and the first in line after the capture of Kyiv— Poland»,— he wrote on Telegram.

In mid-March, Kadyrov published an article entitled “The Collapse of the Unipolar World” in which he discussed the reasons for the start of the Russian military operation in Ukraine. He repeated the theses of the Russian leadership that NATO did not fulfill its promise not to move east, while the West at the same time fueled Russophobic sentiments inside Ukraine. In addition, he mentioned the shelling of the territories of the DPR and LPR after the referendum on the independence of the republics held there, Kyiv’s failure to comply with the Minsk agreements, “sanctions series” against Russia, as well as the threat of Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky to withdraw from the Budapest Memorandum, according to which Ukraine renounces nuclear weapons in exchange for security guarantees.

At the end of June, the head of Chechnya already threatened to “take away Warsaw, Poland , Romania". The larger the country, the more interesting. <…> We will dictate our rules, & mdash; he said.

Authors Tags Subscribe to RuTube RBC Live broadcasts, videos and recordings of programs on our RuTube channel

Источник rbc.ru

Experts assessed the likelihood of NATO dissolution and the possible consequences of this event

“This is the destruction of a bad tooth”

Bundestag deputy from the Left Party Sevim Dagdelen said on July 18 that EU countries should prepare for the dissolution of the North Atlantic Alliance and start pursuing a policy that is not based on views USA. The opinions of domestic experts regarding the dissolution of NATO in a conversation with Vechernyaya Moskva were divided, but experts believe that changes are inevitable anyway.

Photo: Global Look Press

Political scientist Dmitry Zhuravlev admits the possibility of the dissolution of the North Atlantic Alliance, but not in the near future. He explained that Germany is the main country in the European Union, and the United States has a significant influence on it. Nevertheless, the specialist believes that the very fact of the emergence of thoughts about the dissolution of NATO is proof that things will go to dissolution.

According to Zhuravlev, the liquidation of NATO is the destruction of a sore tooth, due to which the level of political and military tension in the world will drop sharply, which will be a very good outcome, including for Russia. The expert recalled that before there were two NATO blocs, and later only one remained, and if there is not a single one, then everyone will only get better from this. The political scientist stressed that the existence of two blocks of the alliance had a certain stabilizing value, and at the moment there is only a clear call for aggression.

Political scientist Sergei Markelov, in turn, believes that the dissolution of NATO is impossible, but the alliance is now experiencing problems and is waiting for a “reset”, which can be expressed in the weakening of US influence. According to the expert, the dissolution of NATO could be a disaster for the Western world, since the countries are too accustomed to this military bloc, and its elimination will be too painful.

However, the specialist is convinced that the alliance will definitely be “rebooted”, as the mood of its members in the world is changing. According to Markelov, NATO members are tired of US pressure, and they want equality, create their own weapons, strengthen and be on an equal footing. The political scientist predicts that the internal content and principles of interaction in the alliance will soon change.

As Markelov noted, NATO was created on the basis of the illusion of collective security, but the alliance will now align its history under the pressure of secondary states. The expert suggests that these countries will insist that the organization deal with security, and not create tense structures around the world.

Thus, according to the political scientist, NATO will create protective weapons, and the armies will be set up to maintain the sovereignty of countries, although now they are set up only to violate foreign borders. Markelov concluded that the alliance will “transform in all directions”, but this process will be long and difficult.

Read also:The political scientist called the turning point in the special operation in Ukraine

p>

Источник www.mk.ru